Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: Push i915_sw_fence_wait into the nonblocking atomic commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Daniel Vetter (2017-07-19 13:54:57)
> Blocking in a worker is ok, 

but needlessly inefficient,

> that's what the unbound_wq is for. And it
> unifies the paths between the blocking and nonblocking commit, giving
> me just one path where I have to implement the deadlock avoidance
> trickery in the next patch.

For reference, I did that the other way by moving it all over to fences.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux