On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 06:00:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > There's a bunch of reasons why I think we should formalize and enforce > our review rules for igt patches: > > - We have a lot of new engineers joining and review helps enormously > with mentoring and learning. But right now only patches from > contributors without commit rights are consistently subjected to > review, which makes this imbalanced and removes senior contributors > from the review pool. > > - We have a much bigger team and we need to make sure we're aligned on > where igt as a tool and testsuite needs to head towards. Getting > that alignment happens through reviewing each other's submission. > Pushing a contentious patch and then dealing with a heated irc > discussion is much less effective. > > - Finally igt becomes ever more important for our testing, making sure > the code quality is high is important. Review helps with that. > > v2: Improve wording a bit (Imre). > > Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@xxxxxxxxx> With the recent growth in contributions it's a good thing :-) Thanks! -- Cheers, Arek _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
