On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 10:29:41AM -0700, Michel Thierry wrote: > On 06/07/17 04:12, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:25:02AM -0700, Michel Thierry wrote: > > > Platforms with per-engine reset enabled (i915.reset=2) are unlikely to > > > perform a full chip reset, keeping the reset_count unmodified. In order > > > to keep the expectations of this test, enforce that full GPU reset is > > > enabled (i915.reset=1). > > > > > > Later on, we can expand the reset_stats ioctl to also return the number > > > of per-engine resets and use reset_count + reset_engine_count when > > > checking for the updated reset count. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > This no longer applies due to changes in the context. It would be nice > > if you would send rebased version as well :-) > > Hi Arek, > > I think the v2 of these patches still apply cleanly, > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/164248/ and > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/164249/ Since you've said that you have a consensus with Antionio, and the patches LGTM. Acked-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@xxxxxxxxx> Pushed, thanks! _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
