Re: [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/psr: Re-create a hsw_psr_enable_source.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This sequence is part of enable source anyways, but they
> only need to be executed once and not on every activation,
> So let's re-create hsw_enable_source.
>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Vathsala NAgaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 2fbf803f0667..422033a6f9f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -219,6 +219,47 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	I915_WRITE(aux_ctl_reg, aux_ctl);
>  }
>  
> +static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> +	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> +	struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(dig_port->base.base.crtc);
> +	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc->config->cpu_transcoder;
> +
> +	u32 chicken;
> +
> +	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> +		chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER;
> +		if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support)
> +			chicken |= PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;
> +		I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), chicken);
> +		I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL,
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP |
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MAX_SLEEP |
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_DISP_REG_WRITE);
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * Per Spec: Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking MEMUP
> +		 * and HPD. also mask LPSP to avoid dependency on other
> +		 * drivers that might block runtime_pm besides
> +		 * preventing  other hw tracking issues now we can rely
> +		 * on frontbuffer tracking.
> +		 */
> +		I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL,
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP);
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The rest of enable source sequence that should be here is actually
> +	 * executed during activation time. So check hsw_psr_activate().
> +	 */
> +}
> +
>  static void vlv_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> @@ -474,9 +515,6 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>  	struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> -	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(intel_dig_port->base.base.crtc);
> -	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc->config->cpu_transcoder;
> -	u32 chicken;
>  
>  	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
>  		return;
> @@ -501,34 +539,11 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>  		hsw_psr_setup_vsc(intel_dp);
>  
> -		if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> -			chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER;
> -			if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support)
> -				chicken |= PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;
> -			I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), chicken);
> -			I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL,
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP |
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MAX_SLEEP |
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_DISP_REG_WRITE);
> -		} else {
> -			/*
> -			 * Per Spec: Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking MEMUP
> -			 * and HPD. also mask LPSP to avoid dependency on other
> -			 * drivers that might block runtime_pm besides
> -			 * preventing  other hw tracking issues now we can rely
> -			 * on frontbuffer tracking.
> -			 */
> -			I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL,
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP);
> -		}
> -
>  		/* Enable PSR on the panel */
>  		hsw_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp);
>  
> +		hsw_psr_enable_source(intel_dp);
> +

Wouldn't it be better to keep the order? Or have the order changed in a
separate patch if you need the order changed?

BR,
Jani.

>  		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
>  			intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
>  	} else {
> @@ -537,12 +552,6 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		/* Enable PSR on the panel */
>  		vlv_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp);
>  
> -		/* On HSW+ enable_source also means go to PSR entry/active
> -		 * state as soon as idle_frame achieved and here would be
> -		 * to soon. However on VLV enable_source just enable PSR
> -		 * but let it on inactive state. So we might do this prior
> -		 * to active transition, i.e. here.
> -		 */
>  		vlv_psr_enable_source(intel_dp);
>  	}

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux