On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Michel Dänzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 13/07/17 09:31 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Michel Dänzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 18/04/17 07:07 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >>>> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> Chris / Ilia / Ben, this should be manageable for the intel/nouveau >>>> drivers, right? >>> >>> Any feedback, guys? >>> >>> I want to push the xserver change soon-ish. I could probably come up >>> with a corresponding patch for nouveau in the worst case, but I'm afraid >>> not for intel. >> >> Sorry, I'm not 1000% clear on what this patch is doing. > > 100% should suffice. ;) > >> Is it literally just a type change from A to B and so code has to be fixed >> up for the new API? > > That's basically it, corresponding to > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/150938/ . >From a brief glance at nouveau, it never uses PixmapDirtyUpdate, except in src/nv_driver.c where I don't think the code would need to be updated. https://cgit.freedesktop.org/nouveau/xf86-video-nouveau/tree/src/nv_driver.c#n552 Let me know if you think I'm off. -ilia _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
