On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 06:12:50PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote: > Regards > > Shashank > > > On 7/13/2017 6:01 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:02:18AM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote: > >> Regards > >> > >> Shashank > >> > >> > >> On 7/12/2017 10:48 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:48:34PM +0530, Shashank Sharma wrote: > >>>> YCBCR420 modes are supported only on HDMI 2.0 capable sources. > >>>> This patch adds: > >>>> - A drm helper to validate YCBCR420-only mode on a particular > >>>> connector. This function will help pruning the YCBCR420-only > >>>> modes from the connector's modelist. > >>>> - A bool variable (ycbcr_420_allowed) in the drm connector structure. > >>>> While handling the EDID from HDMI 2.0 sinks, its important to know > >>>> if the source is capable of handling YCBCR420 output, so that no > >>>> YCBCR 420 modes will be listed for sources which can't handle it. > >>>> A driver should set this variable if it wants to see YCBCR420 modes > >>>> in the modedb. > >>>> > >>>> V5: Introduced the patch in series. > >>>> V5-resend: Squashed two patches (validate YCBCR420 and add YCBCR420 > >>>> identifier) > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> --- > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 3 ++- > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c | 4 ++++ > >>>> include/drm/drm_connector.h | 9 +++++++++ > >>>> include/drm/drm_edid.h | 1 + > >>>> include/drm/drm_modes.h | 5 +++++ > >>>> 6 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > >>>> index 10dab62..44be128 100644 > >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > >>>> @@ -2950,10 +2950,11 @@ u8 drm_match_cea_mode(const struct drm_display_mode *to_match) > >>>> } > >>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_match_cea_mode); > >>>> > >>>> -static bool drm_valid_cea_vic(u8 vic) > >>>> +bool drm_valid_cea_vic(u8 vic) > >>>> { > >>>> return vic > 0 && vic < ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes); > >>>> } > >>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_valid_cea_vic); > >>>> > >>>> /** > >>>> * drm_get_cea_aspect_ratio - get the picture aspect ratio corresponding to > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c > >>>> index f2493b9..3b53c8e3 100644 > >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c > >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c > >>>> @@ -1083,6 +1083,34 @@ drm_mode_validate_size(const struct drm_display_mode *mode, > >>>> } > >>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_validate_size); > >>>> > >>>> +/** > >>>> + * drm_mode_ycbcr420_only - add 'ycbcr420-only' modes only when allowed > >>>> + * @mode: mode to check > >>>> + * @connector: drm connector under action > >>>> + * > >>>> + * This function is a helper which can be used to filter out any YCBCR420 > >>>> + * only mode, when the source doesn't support it. > >>>> + * > >>>> + * Returns: > >>>> + * The mode status > >>>> + */ > >>>> +enum drm_mode_status > >>>> +drm_mode_validate_ycbcr420(const struct drm_display_mode *mode, > >>>> + struct drm_connector *connector) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + u8 vic = drm_match_cea_mode(mode); > >>>> + enum drm_mode_status status = MODE_OK; > >>>> + struct drm_hdmi_info *hdmi = &connector->display_info.hdmi; > >>>> + > >>>> + if (drm_valid_cea_vic(vic) && test_bit(vic, hdmi->y420_vdb_modes)) { > >>> Still think the valid check is pointless. > >> I still think that we should only pass valid CEA VIC to VDB check, but > >> Ok, I will remove that. > >>> Skipping that would also avoid > >>> having to make the function non-static > >> Ok > >>> (the EXPORT_SYMBOL there seems > >>> unnecessary either way). > >> Why ? > > It's all in the same module AFAICS. > > > > Oh, and the patch ordering here still looks potentially problematic. We > > should add the 420 mode validation before we start adding the 420 modes. > > Otherwise anyone bisecting through this may get a black/corrupted screen > > if they have a monitor with "420 only" modes. > Actually, the 420 mode validation patch uses 420_only bitmap, which is > added in add_420_modes patch. > So I can't put this patch before other one (you reviewed that sequence > once, and found that). I guess then you just need to add the bitmap already in the validation patch. An alternative would be just squash the patches, but that seems a bit drastic, and probably would mix up too many things in one patch. > - Shashank > >>>> + if (!connector->ycbcr_420_allowed) > >>>> + status = MODE_NO_420; > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + return status; > >>>> +} > >>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_validate_ycbcr420); > >>>> + > >>>> #define MODE_STATUS(status) [MODE_ ## status + 3] = #status > >>>> > >>>> static const char * const drm_mode_status_names[] = { > >>> ^ > >>> This thing needs to be updated as well. > >> Oh sorry, good catch. > >> - Shashank > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c > >>>> index 00e6832..904966c 100644 > >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c > >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c > >>>> @@ -528,6 +528,10 @@ int drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, > >>>> if (mode->status == MODE_OK) > >>>> mode->status = drm_mode_validate_pipeline(mode, > >>>> connector); > >>>> + > >>>> + if (mode->status == MODE_OK) > >>>> + mode->status = drm_mode_validate_ycbcr420(mode, > >>>> + connector); > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> prune: > >>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_connector.h b/include/drm/drm_connector.h > >>>> index b3af8e3..225e092 100644 > >>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_connector.h > >>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_connector.h > >>>> @@ -746,6 +746,15 @@ struct drm_connector { > >>>> bool interlace_allowed; > >>>> bool doublescan_allowed; > >>>> bool stereo_allowed; > >>>> + > >>>> + /** > >>>> + * @ycbcr_420_allowed : This bool indicates if this connector is > >>>> + * capable of handling YCBCR 420 output. While parsing the EDID > >>>> + * blocks, its very helpful to know, if the source is capable of > >>>> + * handling YCBCR 420 outputs. > >>>> + */ > >>>> + bool ycbcr_420_allowed; > >>>> + > >>>> /** > >>>> * @registered: Is this connector exposed (registered) with userspace? > >>>> * Protected by @mutex. > >>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_edid.h b/include/drm/drm_edid.h > >>>> index 89c0062..b55b2a7 100644 > >>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_edid.h > >>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_edid.h > >>>> @@ -477,4 +477,5 @@ void drm_edid_get_monitor_name(struct edid *edid, char *name, > >>>> struct drm_display_mode *drm_mode_find_dmt(struct drm_device *dev, > >>>> int hsize, int vsize, int fresh, > >>>> bool rb); > >>>> +bool drm_valid_cea_vic(u8 vic); > >>>> #endif /* __DRM_EDID_H__ */ > >>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_modes.h b/include/drm/drm_modes.h > >>>> index 94ac771..f8a1268 100644 > >>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_modes.h > >>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_modes.h > >>>> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct videomode; > >>>> * @MODE_ONE_SIZE: only one resolution is supported > >>>> * @MODE_NO_REDUCED: monitor doesn't accept reduced blanking > >>>> * @MODE_NO_STEREO: stereo modes not supported > >>>> + * @MODE_NO_420: ycbcr 420 modes not supported > >>>> * @MODE_STALE: mode has become stale > >>>> * @MODE_BAD: unspecified reason > >>>> * @MODE_ERROR: error condition > >>>> @@ -124,6 +125,7 @@ enum drm_mode_status { > >>>> MODE_ONE_SIZE, > >>>> MODE_NO_REDUCED, > >>>> MODE_NO_STEREO, > >>>> + MODE_NO_420, > >>>> MODE_STALE = -3, > >>>> MODE_BAD = -2, > >>>> MODE_ERROR = -1 > >>>> @@ -496,6 +498,9 @@ bool drm_mode_equal_no_clocks_no_stereo(const struct drm_display_mode *mode1, > >>>> enum drm_mode_status drm_mode_validate_basic(const struct drm_display_mode *mode); > >>>> enum drm_mode_status drm_mode_validate_size(const struct drm_display_mode *mode, > >>>> int maxX, int maxY); > >>>> +enum drm_mode_status > >>>> +drm_mode_validate_ycbcr420(const struct drm_display_mode *mode, > >>>> + struct drm_connector *connector); > >>>> void drm_mode_prune_invalid(struct drm_device *dev, > >>>> struct list_head *mode_list, bool verbose); > >>>> void drm_mode_sort(struct list_head *mode_list); > >>>> -- > >>>> 2.7.4 > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> dri-devel mailing list > >>>> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx