Em Ter, 2017-07-11 às 15:48 -0700, Jim Bride escreveu: > This work-around actually causes issues on HSW now. Without this > code in-place I'm seeing good results on HSW. Which issues? > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c > b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c > index 6f8fd20..2e9a169 100644 > --- a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c > +++ b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c > @@ -436,12 +436,6 @@ static bool > connector_get_mode(drmModeConnectorPtr c, drmModeModeInfoPtr *mode) > else > *mode = &c->modes[0]; > > - /* On HSW the CRC WA is so awful that it makes you think > everything is > - * bugged. */ > - if (IS_HASWELL(intel_get_drm_devid(drm.fd)) && > - c->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP) > - *mode = &std_1024_mode; > - > return true; > } > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
