Op 07-07-17 om 02:15 schreef Gustavo Padovan: > Hi Maarten, > > 2017-07-06 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> I wanted to make kms_atomic_transition pass, but the nonblocking modeset >> fencing tests were bogus. >> >> This series changes the semantics for fencing slightly. It only keeps the out fences >> in pipe_obj->out_fence_fd, it's up to the test to decide what to do with it, which >> is probably just waiting on the fd or checking if it completed. >> >> Maarten Lankhorst (5): >> tests/kms_atomic_transition: Add test for plane completion ordering. >> lib/kms: Handle fence interaction correctly WRT TEST_ONLY. >> tests/kms_atomic_transition: Only request fence on enabled pipes >> tests/kms_atomic_transition: Do not clear in-fences after atomic >> commit. >> igt/kms: Do not wait for fence completion during commit >> >> lib/igt_kms.c | 41 ++++++++---------- >> tests/kms_atomic_transition.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- >> 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) > This make fencing a lot cleaner. > > For the whole series: > > Acked-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Gustavo > Thanks, pushed. :) _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
