On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 04:57:25PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 01:59:54PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
> > index fc8ef42203ec..b3ef4f1c2630 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
> > @@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static int atomic_remove_fb(struct drm_framebuffer *fb)
> > drm_atomic_clean_old_fb(dev, plane_mask, ret);
> >
> > if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
> > + drm_atomic_state_clear(state);
>
> Hmm. We seem to be missing this all over. Do those other places need it
> as well? Hard to say without a commit message explaining why we need it
> here.
>
> Should we just back it into drm_modeset_backoff() if it's always needed?
s/back/bake/
>
> > drm_modeset_backoff(&ctx);
> > goto retry;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
