Hi Daniel,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:30:17PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 05:54:18PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
Oops, missed that, applied.
Btw, for regression fixes like that, could you perhaps auto-generate the
Fixes: line per the kernel process? Makes it easier for me to know where
to apply something :-)
That's a good idea for commits in mainline, where the Fixes tag will
look like
Fixes: e21d2170f366 ("video: remove unnecessary platform_set_drvdata()")
However typically 0day auto-generated patches are pre-mainline ones,
in which case only patch subject is available. How are we going to
deal with this?
Thanks,
Fengguang
---
arcpgu_crtc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/arcpgu_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/arcpgu_crtc.c
index 99fbdae..611af74 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/arcpgu_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/arcpgu_crtc.c
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_funcs arc_pgu_crtc_funcs = {
.atomic_destroy_state = drm_atomic_helper_crtc_destroy_state,
};
-enum drm_mode_status arc_pgu_crtc_mode_valid(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
- const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
+static enum drm_mode_status arc_pgu_crtc_mode_valid(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
+ const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
{
struct arcpgu_drm_private *arcpgu = crtc_to_arcpgu_priv(crtc);
long rate, clk_rate = mode->clock * 1000;
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
kbuild-all mailing list
kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild-all
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
