Re: [kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx: Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Gred and Alex:
Thanks for the reply! It would be better that kernel only provides functions instead of maintaining states from my point of view. If there is any existing async notification channel in vfio device fd? like reporting device events from vfio to QEMU? If so, It would be nice if we can extend that channel and notify the userspace application that guest framebuffer changed via that channel. So userspace application even doesn't need to call the ioctl periodically. :) If VM runs a single-buffered application.

Thanks,
Zhi.

On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 15:49 +0800, Zhi Wang wrote:
Hi:
      Thanks for the discussions! If the userspace application has
already maintained a LRU list, it looks like we don't need
generation
anymore,
generation isn't required, things are working just fine without that.
It is just a small optimization, userspace can skip the LRU lookup
altogether if the generation didn't change.

But of couse that only pays off if the kernel doesn't has to put much
effort into maintaining the generation id.  Something simple like
increasing it each time the guest writes a register which affects
plane_info.

If you think it doesn't make sense from the driver point of view we can
drop the generation.

cheers,
   Gerd
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux