Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-06-21 14:37:33) > > On 21/06/2017 12:46, Chris Wilson wrote: > > It's the replacement for the removed idle_work, but now I realise that we > > are guaranteed a i915_gem_retire_requests() as part of the reset procedure. > > So will be respinning with this removed? I will send it on after finishing an oops reproducer (for drm_setversion). Currently I've bdw/bxt doing hang testing just to gain some more confidence -- though by design they shouldn't be hitting this path at all anymore (per-engine lockless resets ftw). pnv now recovers from its struct_mutex deadlock just fine. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
