On 25 April 2017 at 23:32, Lionel Landwerlin
<lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tests/perf.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/perf.c b/tests/perf.c
> index d057d943..f8ac06c3 100644
> --- a/tests/perf.c
> +++ b/tests/perf.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,29 @@ gen8_read_report_reason(const uint32_t *report)
> return "unknown";
> }
>
> +static bool
> +oa_report_is_periodic(uint32_t oa_exponent, const uint32_t *report)
> +{
> +
spurious newline.
> + if (IS_HASWELL(devid)) {
> + /* For Haswell we don't have a documented report reason field
> + * (though empirically report[0] bit 10 does seem to correlate
> + * with a timer trigger reason) so we instead infer which
> + * reports are timer triggered by checking if the least
> + * significant bits are zero and the exponent bit is set.
> + */
> + uint32_t oa_exponent_mask = (1 << (oa_exponent + 1)) - 1;
newline.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
