Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-06-16 11:55:30) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > > For tests with attempt to hit races and such by running for > relatively long time, it seems that it might be possible to get > by only testing some subtest-engine combinations as long as in > total we still exercise all engines per test. > > More precisely, I think that if we view our engines as fast > (!rcs) and a little less fast (others), we group the race > hitting tests in those two camps, we keep the same coverage > by running each subtest against each engine group. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist | 44 ---------------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 44 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist > index e0926ff09bcd..246a14f6e501 100644 > --- a/tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist > igt@gem_sync@blt > -igt@gem_sync@bsd > -igt@gem_sync@bsd1 > -igt@gem_sync@bsd2 > -igt@gem_sync@many-blt > igt@gem_sync@many-bsd > -igt@gem_sync@many-bsd1 > -igt@gem_sync@many-bsd2 > igt@gem_sync@many-render > -igt@gem_sync@many-vebox > igt@gem_sync@render > -igt@gem_sync@store-blt > -igt@gem_sync@store-bsd > -igt@gem_sync@store-bsd1 > -igt@gem_sync@store-bsd2 > igt@gem_sync@store-render > igt@gem_sync@store-vebox > -igt@gem_sync@vebox The selection should be igt@gem_sync@*all* then any smattering of other engines, if desired but coverage of races on individual engines should already be good enough. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
