Hi, > > +struct vfio_dmabuf_mgr_plane_info { > > + __u64 start; > > + __u64 drm_format_mod; > > + __u32 drm_format; > > + __u32 width; > > + __u32 height; > > + __u32 stride; > > + __u32 size; > > + __u32 x_pos; > > + __u32 y_pos; > > + __u32 padding; > > +}; > > + > > This structure is generic, can remove dmabuf from its name, > vfio_plane_info or vfio_vgpu_surface_info since this will only be > used > by vgpu. Agree. > > +struct vfio_dmabuf_mgr_query_plane { > > + __u32 argsz; > > + __u32 flags; > > + struct vfio_dmabuf_mgr_plane_info plane_info; > > + __u32 plane_id; > > +}; > > + > > +#define VFIO_DMABUF_MGR_QUERY_PLANE _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 15) > > + > > This same interface can be used to query surface/plane information > for > both, dmabuf and region, case. Here also 'DMABUF' can be removed and > define flags if you want to differentiate query for 'dmabuf' and > 'region'. Hmm, any specific reason why you want use a ioctl for that? I would simply place a "struct vfio_dmabuf_mgr_plane_info" (or whatever the final name will be) at the start of the region. cheers, Gerd _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx