On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ugh, this one flew right by me, and I never even caught it. And that > was because it was sent To: the intel-gfx list, and only had a cc: for > stable, much like all of the other i915 stable patches that you all want > in stable trees, but are not yet included in your tree. I presume this is because git send-email automatically adds Cc's from the patches, and Cc: stable is not an exception. Are you suggesting the backport should've been sent To: stable, or that we should avoid Cc'ing stable altogether when sending patches? I feel like you're having a grumpy bias towards i915, and everything about us ticks you off now. :( BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
