On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:29:57AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Dan Carpenter (2017-06-14 10:14:52) > > These tests are reversed so it complains on every successful call and > > stays quiet for every failure. Also we may as well preserve the error > > code. > > The test is correct. The expectation here is that i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin() > fails and reports ENOSPC as we have already allocated the entire GGTT. If it > doesn't then we report the test failure. > -Chris Ah. Ok. Thanks. This was triggering a static checker warning because we're passing a valid pointer to PTR_ERR(). Probably the easiest thing is just to ignore the warning... regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
