Re: [PATCH i-g-t] igt/kms_properties.c: fix test case for setting immutable properties

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:06:44PM -0400, Bhawanpreet Lakha wrote:
> Test doesn't check if the property is immutable, and fails.
> Added conditions to detect if the property is immutable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tests/kms_properties.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/kms_properties.c b/tests/kms_properties.c
> index c15026b8..9585e8e9 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_properties.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_properties.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,11 @@ static void test_properties(int fd, uint32_t type, uint32_t id, bool atomic)
>  		if (!atomic) {
>  			ret = drmModeObjectSetProperty(fd, id, type, prop_id, prop_value);
>  
> -			igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> +			if (!(prop->flags & DRM_MODE_PROP_IMMUTABLE))
> +				igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> +			else
> +				igt_assert(ret != 0);
> +
>  		} else {
>  			ret = drmModeAtomicAddProperty(req, id, prop_id, prop_value);
>  			igt_assert(ret >= 0);


What about read only properties and setting them using the atomic calls
below?

Do we have that scenario already? Seems lika a potential false fail as
well.

-- 
Cheers,
Arek

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux