On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:06:44PM -0400, Bhawanpreet Lakha wrote:
> Test doesn't check if the property is immutable, and fails.
> Added conditions to detect if the property is immutable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> tests/kms_properties.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_properties.c b/tests/kms_properties.c
> index c15026b8..9585e8e9 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_properties.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_properties.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,11 @@ static void test_properties(int fd, uint32_t type, uint32_t id, bool atomic)
> if (!atomic) {
> ret = drmModeObjectSetProperty(fd, id, type, prop_id, prop_value);
>
> - igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> + if (!(prop->flags & DRM_MODE_PROP_IMMUTABLE))
> + igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
> + else
> + igt_assert(ret != 0);
> +
> } else {
> ret = drmModeAtomicAddProperty(req, id, prop_id, prop_value);
> igt_assert(ret >= 0);
What about read only properties and setting them using the atomic calls
below?
Do we have that scenario already? Seems lika a potential false fail as
well.
--
Cheers,
Arek
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
