Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2017-06-08 17:22:40) > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 07:03:55PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:07:32PM +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > > > This is the only field from i915_params struct which name does not match > > > the the name of the param that it is associated with. Lets fix that now > > > as this will unblock us with further improvements around params defs. > > > > Maybe we should rename the modparam instead since it does affect eDP as > > well. Thoughts? > > > > For me it's fine (and maybe even easier). > But I'm not sure how "stable" modparams need to be. Soft. Since it is used to quirk hw behaviour, occasionally upsetting the apple-cart so that a user files a bug report and we get it added to the quirk table is a small price to pay in annoyance. If no one notices, the modparam may have outlived its usefulness. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
