On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 05:47:23PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Jun 2017, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 04:45:07PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Mon, 15 May 2017, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > The following commits have been marked as Cc: stable or fixing something
> >> > in v4.12-rc1 or earlier, but failed to cherry-pick to
> >> > drm-intel-fixes. Please see if they are worth backporting, and please do
> >> > so if they are.
> >>
> >> Update:
> >>
> >> d96a7d2adb04 ("drm/i915: Fix scaling check for 90/270 degree plane rotation")
> >> fce5adf568ab ("drm/i915: Fix SKL+ watermarks for 90/270 rotation")
> >>
> >> I am about to pick up 73714c05df97 ("drm/i915: Fix 90/270 rotated
> >> coordinates for FBC") which does apply cleanly - does it make sense
> >> without the other two?
> >
> > Probably not. Shouldn't be too hard for me to fix up the other two
> > since I already resolved the same conflicts in the other direction
> > when applying the patches ;)
>
> Whoops, I already sent the pull request without the two. Anything bad in
> me queuing the backports you provided in the next -rc? Or should I
> recall the pull request to include these two at the same time?
Next -rc is fine. No need to rush.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
