On ke, 2017-06-07 at 17:30 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2017.06.05 14:55:41 +0800, Tina Zhang wrote:
> >
> > @@ -53,12 +53,18 @@ enum vgt_g2v_type {
> > VGT_G2V_MAX,
> > };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * VGT capabilities type
> > + */
> > +#define VGT_CAPS_FULL_PPGTT BIT(2)
> > +
>
> As I think your gvt change will depend on this bit too, so have to merge
> them in order, right? Joonas, ok for me to merge through gvt tree together
> for -next pull?
Yes, that way the ordering gets right. As mentioned in IRC, the
major/minor version checking should be merged first, and this updated
to use that.
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
