On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 06:01:10PM -0700, Michel Thierry wrote: > On 5/31/2017 12:05 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > >Commit 7c3f86b6dc51 ("drm/i915: Invalidate the guc ggtt TLB upon > >insertion") added the restoration of the invalidation routine after the > >GuC was disabled, but missed that the GuC was unconditionally disabled > >when not used. This then overwrites the invalidate routine for the older > >chipsets, causing havoc and breaking resume as the most obvious victim. > > > >We place the guard inside i915_ggtt_disable_guc() to be backport > >friendly (the bug was introduced into v4.11) but it would be preferred > >to be in more control over when this was guard (i.e. do not try and > >teardown the data structures before we have enabled them). That should > >be true with the reorganisation of the guc loaders. > > > >Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Fixes: 7c3f86b6dc51 ("drm/i915: Invalidate the guc ggtt TLB upon insertion") > >Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx> > >Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> > >Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx> > >Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@xxxxxxxxx> > >Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.11+ > Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx> > > btw the bug can only happen in 4.11; in 4.12+ this safeguard is > already redundant since enable_guc_loading should be zero and > ggtt_disable_guc is never called. Thanks for the review, pushed so we can get it back to where it needs to go. I'll send a patch to convert this to an assert in a moment. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx