Hi Gerd, I found this problem once I sent the patches :( I checked the uapi definitions and found it is usually called pad to do the aligning. So I changed the 'resv' to 'pad' in the patch but forgot to update it in the last patch and did not test after the "small" change. Next time I will test even when the change is very small. I will change this in the next version. Sorry for the mistake. >-----Original Message----- >From: Gerd Hoffmann [mailto:kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 4:59 PM >To: Chen, Xiaoguang <xiaoguang.chen@xxxxxxxxx>; >alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx; chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; intel- >gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >zhenyuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Lv, Zhiyuan <zhiyuan.lv@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-gvt- >dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Wang, Zhi A <zhi.a.wang@xxxxxxxxx>; Tian, Kevin ><kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g > >On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 02:29 +0000, Chen, Xiaoguang wrote: >> Hi Gerd, >> >> It is based on 4.12.0-rc1 > >Applies, good. >But then fails to build: > >error: ‘struct vfio_vgpu_dmabuf_info’ has no member named ‘resv’ > >gvt/kvmgt.c:611:11: note: in expansion of macro ‘offsetofend’ > minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_vgpu_dmabuf_info, resv); > >/me wonders how this was tested ... > >cheers, > Gerd _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
