Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Fix false-positive assert_rpm_wakelock_held in i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 19-05-17 15:27, Hans de Goede wrote:
assert_rpm_wakelock_held is triggered from i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier
even though it gets unregistered on (runtime) suspend, this is caused
by a race happening under the following circumstances:

intel_runtime_pm_put does:

    atomic_dec(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count);

    pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(kdev);
    pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(kdev);

And pm_runtime_put_autosuspend calls intel_runtime_suspend from
a workqueue, so there is ample of time between the atomic_dec() and
intel_runtime_suspend() unregistering the notifier. If the notifier
gets called in this windowd assert_rpm_wakelock_held falsely triggers
(at this point we're not runtime-suspended yet).

This commit adds disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts and
enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts calls around the
intel_uncore_forcewake_get(FORCEWAKE_ALL) call in
i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier fixing the false-positive WARN_ON.

Reported-by: FKr <bugs-freedesktop@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>

Ping, what is the status of this series?

I've been running this series on several Bay and Cherry Trail devices
since I posted this without issues.

As this fixes a couple of corner case wrt the pmic bus access
sharing merged for 4.12, it would be nice to get these
queued up and of possible added to a 4.12-rc#.

The only patch which changes code / functionality which was present
in 4.11 is the 3th patch, which I added because Ville requested the
change. The other 3 can be queued up for 4.12 without the 3th patch.

Regards,

Hans



---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 7 +++++++
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 6d1ea26b2493..dc5e4f3e5a43 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -1286,8 +1286,15 @@ static int i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
  		 * bus, which will be busy after this notification, leading to:
  		 * "render: timed out waiting for forcewake ack request."
  		 * errors.
+		 *
+		 * This notifier may get called between intel_runtime_pm_put()
+		 * doing atomic_dec(wakeref_count) and intel_runtime_resume()
+		 * unregistering this notifier, which leads to false-positive
+		 * assert_rpm_wakelock_held() triggering.
  		 */
+		disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
  		intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+		enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
  		break;
  	case MBI_PMIC_BUS_ACCESS_END:
  		intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux