On 05/26/2017 12:13 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 25 May 2017, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> @@ -4179,6 +4181,33 @@ intel_dp_check_mst_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> +static bool
>> +intel_dp_check_cec_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> +{
>> + bool handled = false;
>> +
>> + for (;;) {
>> + u8 cec_irq;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
>> + DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI1,
>> + &cec_irq);
>> + if (ret < 0 || !(cec_irq & DP_CEC_IRQ))
>> + return handled;
>> +
>> + cec_irq &= ~DP_CEC_IRQ;
>> + drm_dp_cec_irq(&intel_dp->aux);
>> + handled = true;
>> +
>> + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
>> + DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI1,
>> + cec_irq);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return handled;
>> + }
>
> DP sinks suck. Please add a limit to the loop.
Good to know. I wondered about that.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
