On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 06:31:10PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On ke, 2017-05-24 at 15:55 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 03:39:37PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > > > Having resolved whether or not we would deadlock upon a call to > > > mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex), we can then wait for the contended > > > struct_mutex if we are not the owner. This should significantly improve > > > the chance of running the shrinker for other processes whilst the GPU is > > > busy. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Scratch this, cyclic deadlocks with the reclaim locks instead. If BAT > > doesn't pick this up, I'll be woried. > > Whole series or just this patch? Just this patch is buggy (as far as I am aware). -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
