Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Remove action status and statistics from debugfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:52:07PM +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> Usefulness of these stats were over-advertised.
> 
> Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 6 ------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c     | 7 -------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h     | 7 -------
>  3 files changed, 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index bd9abef..7d8f9cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2525,12 +2525,6 @@ static int i915_guc_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  	seq_printf(m, "\t%*pb\n", GUC_NUM_DOORBELLS, guc->doorbell_bitmap);
>  	seq_printf(m, "Doorbell next cacheline: 0x%x\n\n", guc->db_cacheline);
>  
> -	seq_printf(m, "GuC total action count: %llu\n", guc->action_count);
> -	seq_printf(m, "GuC action failure count: %u\n", guc->action_fail);
> -	seq_printf(m, "GuC last action command: 0x%x\n", guc->action_cmd);
> -	seq_printf(m, "GuC last action status: 0x%x\n", guc->action_status);
> -	seq_printf(m, "GuC last action error code: %d\n", guc->action_err);
> -
>  	total = 0;
>  	seq_printf(m, "\nGuC submissions:\n");
>  	for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> index 07c5658..d27b527 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> @@ -440,9 +440,6 @@ int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len)
>  	mutex_lock(&guc->send_mutex);
>  	intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv, guc->send_regs.fw_domains);
>  
> -	dev_priv->guc.action_count += 1;
> -	dev_priv->guc.action_cmd = action[0];
> -
>  	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>  		I915_WRITE(guc_send_reg(guc, i), action[i]);
>  
> @@ -471,11 +468,7 @@ int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len)
>  		DRM_WARN("INTEL_GUC_SEND: Action 0x%X failed;"
>  			 " ret=%d status=0x%08X response=0x%08X\n",
>  			 action[0], ret, status, I915_READ(SOFT_SCRATCH(15)));
> -
> -		dev_priv->guc.action_fail += 1;
> -		dev_priv->guc.action_err = ret;
>  	}
> -	dev_priv->guc.action_status = status;
>  
>  	intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, guc->send_regs.fw_domains);
>  	mutex_unlock(&guc->send_mutex);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> index 7618b71..b3fdfec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> @@ -195,13 +195,6 @@ struct intel_guc {
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(doorbell_bitmap, GUC_NUM_DOORBELLS);
>  	uint32_t db_cacheline;		/* Cyclic counter mod pagesize	*/
>  
> -	/* Action status & statistics */
> -	uint64_t action_count;		/* Total commands issued	*/
> -	uint32_t action_cmd;		/* Last command word		*/
> -	uint32_t action_status;		/* Last return status		*/
> -	uint32_t action_fail;		/* Total number of failures	*/
> -	int32_t action_err;		/* Last error code		*/
> -
>  	uint64_t submissions[I915_NUM_ENGINES];
>  	uint32_t last_seqno[I915_NUM_ENGINES];

Don't stop now, these two are duplicate statistics and not backend
specific.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux