On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 03:20:08PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 05/05/2017 14:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 02:37:41PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>
> >>On 05/05/2017 14:32, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>>On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 02:19:07PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>On 03/05/2017 12:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>struct intel_engine_cs {
> >>>>>@@ -367,6 +373,7 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /* Execlists */
> >>>>> struct tasklet_struct irq_tasklet;
> >>>>>+ struct execlist_priolist default_priolist;
> >>>>> struct execlist_port {
> >>>>> struct drm_i915_gem_request *request_count;
> >>>>>#define EXECLIST_COUNT_BITS 2
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>Just a small bikeshed to consider. Having switched to
> >>>I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL, do we have a better name for default_priolist? I
> >>>still prefer default_priolist over normal_priolist. Go back to
> >>>I915_PRIORITY_DEFAULT?
> >>
> >>default_priolist is fine I think since it is dual purpose. Primary
> >>purpose to avoid allocations as you said.
> >>
> >>Although I am still a bit dejected how some userspace could decide
> >>one day to send everything at I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL - n, in order to
> >>use I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL as the high prio not requiring
> >>cap_sys_admin, and in doing so completely defeat the atomic kmalloc
> >>avoidance. :(
> >
> >Should we just bite the bullet and install a kmem_cache here?
> >It didn't solve the kmalloc error handling, but it does at least give us
> >a freelist. There is a reasonable argument that as soon as userspace
> >starts using non-default priorities, we may see many different levels
> >justifying allocating a whole slab upfront.
>
> Actually my argument is pants since allocations only happen with
> "opening" a new priority level. So I think leave it as it is until
> there is a need.
Patch is ready for kmalloc showing up as a latency source.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
