On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:49:37AM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Use discardable buffers for rings > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/23274/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > Series 23274v1 drm/i915: Use discardable buffers for rings > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/23274/revisions/1/mbox/ > > Test gem_exec_flush: > Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-uc: > pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100007 > Test gem_exec_suspend: > Subgroup basic-s4-devices: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100125 > pass -> DMESG-WARN (fi-kbl-7560u) fdo#100125 > Test kms_cursor_legacy: > Subgroup basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic: > pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2600) > Test pm_rpm: > Subgroup basic-rte: > incomplete -> PASS (fi-bsw-n3050) fdo#100718 > > fdo#100007 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100007 > fdo#100125 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100125 > fdo#100718 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100718 Looks scarier than it actually was. Fixed my typos in the commitmsg and pushed. Thanks for the review, I thought we had been using internal for rings ever since we added the internal allocator (that was one of the intended use cases for the allocator). -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
