On 18/04/17 14:20, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 01:23:32PM -0700, Michel Thierry wrote:
@@ -1329,10 +1331,29 @@ static int gen8_emit_bb_start(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
req->ctx->ppgtt->pd_dirty_rings &= ~intel_engine_flag(req->engine);
}
- cs = intel_ring_begin(req, 4);
+ /* bb_start only */
+ num_dwords = 4;
+
+ /* check if watchdog will be required */
+ if (req->ctx->engine[req->engine->id].watchdog_threshold != 0) {
+ if (!req->engine->emit_start_watchdog ||
+ !req->engine->emit_stop_watchdog)
+ return -EINVAL;
This is still a bug in the context setparam to get to this point without
a watchdog.
This can't happen (threshold != 0 && no emit_watchdog func),
i915_gem_context_set_watchdog returns -ENODEV if vcs's
emit_start_watchdog is not defined (the assumption is if the vcs has it,
rcs does too).
I can remove it, if that's what you mean.
But re i915_gem_context_set_watchdog, I think maybe it should return
ENODEV when there's no watchdog and the user is trying to get the array
size (args->size == 0), and don't give false hopes.
+
+ /* + start_watchdog (6) + stop_watchdog (4) */
+ num_dwords += 10;
+ watchdog_running = true;
+ }
+static u32 *gen8_emit_stop_watchdog(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, u32 *cs)
+{
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine = req->engine;
+
+ /* XXX: no watchdog support in BCS engine */
+ GEM_BUG_ON(engine->id == BCS);
+
+ *cs++ = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(2);
+ *cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(RING_CNTR(engine->mmio_base));
+ *cs++ = get_watchdog_disable(engine);
+ *cs++ = MI_NOOP;
Oops.
_context_set_watchdog also rejects if threshold[BCS] != 0.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
