On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:58:44AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2017, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 08:13:43PM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > >> == Series Details == > >> > >> Series: drm/i915: uninitialized value on error path (rev3) > >> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/23038/ > >> State : success > > > > These patchwork emails are sort of useless. I wouldn't have sent the > > patch if it couldn't compile which is basically all this is testing. > > It's not exercising the failure path. > > Yeah, the CI is not smart enough to know that just by looking at the > patch, so it'll test them all. ;) > But could it just send responses if something fails? Or it could be a much shorter email: CI test successful. Use X-mailer-blahblah to filter successful tests. We don't need to expose all the other internal information unless something fails. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
