On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 01:37:01PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 01:54:45PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Yet again I've proven that I can't negate conditions :(
> >
> > Fixes: eb8eb02ed850 ("drm: Drop modeset_lock_all from the getproperty ioctl")
>
> You also get to write the igt/kms_getproperty, starting with a
> memset(prop_values, 0xc5, foo);
> drmIoctl(GETPROPERTY);
> igt_assert(!memchr(prop_values, 0xc5, bar));
Testcase: igt/kms_properties/get_property-sanity
Thanks for reminding me to not be lazy with testing stuff we've broken!
Pushed the patch to -next-fixes.
Cheers, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
