On Wed, 12 Apr 2017, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:04:00PM +0000, Lofstedt, Marta wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have this "old" Lenovo Cantiga laptop(Intel Core 2 Duo L9400), hocked up to our i915 pre-merge CI system, that has started to give unstable results after commit: >> >> commit 7b09cc5a9debc86c903c2eff8f8a1fdef773c649 >> Author: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Wed Mar 22 16:24:17 2017 -0400 >> >> sched/clock: Fix broken stable to unstable transfer >> >> The issue is describe more in detail here: >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100548 > > I don't click links. Frankly, I find that more than a little offensive response to a regression report. BR, Jani. > >> We have reverted above patch and then issue is no longer reproducible. >> Also, note that this issue has not been reproduced on any of our other machines, >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/ >> >> So, why is this only affecting the Core 2 Duo? > > Core2 doesn't have a usable TSC and would revert to the slow path. I'll > have another look at that patch. > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
