On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Luc Verhaegen <libv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:36:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Luc Verhaegen <libv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:24:04PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Luc Verhaegen <libv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:48:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> >> freedesktop.org has adopted a formal&enforced code of conduct: >> >> >> >> >> >> https://www.fooishbar.org/blog/fdo-contributor-covenant/ >> >> >> https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/CodeOfConduct/ >> >> >> >> >> >> Besides formalizing things a bit more I don't think this changes >> >> >> anything for us, we've already peer-enforced respectful and >> >> >> constructive interactions since a long time. But it's good to document >> >> >> things properly. >> >> >> >> >> >> Note: As Daniel Stone mentioned in the announcement fd.o admins >> >> >> started chatting with the communities their hosting, which includs the >> >> > >> >> > "started" and "chatting"? That is very weakly formulated. >> >> >> >> Intentionally so ... >> >> >> >> >> X.org foundation board, to figure out how to fan out enforcement and >> >> > >> >> > This was not voted upon or even mentioned during the last board meeting. >> >> > And i think the next board meeting is only in 2 days time. As such, this >> >> > seems like it is not something that's officially sanctioned by the X.org >> >> > foundation board, but you sure do try to make it sound like such. >> >> >> >> ... because it is not yet sanctioned by the board in any way. So not >> >> exactly sure where you're reading this into my commit message, because >> >> it wasn't my intention to make it sounds like this is sanctioned by >> >> the xorg board officially, nor did I state that anywhere. I just said >> >> that discussions already started to happen, that's really all there >> >> is. >> > >> > Thanks for making that clear. >> >> Yeah I understand the confusion, since it wasn't clear that this mail >> was written by me with my drm maintainer hat on, not me in my role as >> xorg bod secretary. Nor me as an intel employee. I should have made >> that clearer. > > I was not confused about that, especially since you mentioned the board. > But this clearly was not something already approved by the X.org > foundation board. Since there is a lot of "it" and "this" in both your and Daniel's messages, without clarifying what you're both actually talking about, I think for clarity it should be noted that, AFAIU, the decision to adopt the CoC is up to the freedesktop.org admins, not the X.org board, and the discussion about enforcing is to take place between the two. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
