Re: [PATCH] drm: Document code of conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/04/17 10:51, Archit Taneja wrote:


On 04/11/2017 01:03 PM, Sumit Semwal wrote:
On 11 April 2017 at 12:38, Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

On 11 April 2017 at 07:48, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Note: As Daniel Stone mentioned in the announcement fd.o admins
started chatting with the communities their hosting, which includs the
X.org foundation board, to figure out how to fan out enforcement and
allow projects to run things on their own (with fd.o still as the
fallback).  So the details of enforcement (and appealing decisions)
might still change, but since this involves the board and lots more
people it'll take a while to get there. For now this is good enough I
think.

All true.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for this, Daniel!

Reviewed-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for doing this, this was long overdue!

Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@xxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux