HI, > -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > Of Chris Wilson > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 5:26 PM > To: Wajdeczko, Michal <Michal.Wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Don't allow overuse of > __intel_wait_for_register_fw() > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:17:47PM +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > > This function should not be called with long timeouts in atomic context. > > Annotate it as might_sleep if timeout is longer than 10us. > > > > v2: fix comment (Michal) > > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx> > > Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > And pushed, thanks for the patch and for including the limits in the doc. > -Chris Was there reason why pushed as clearly seen issues on pw run: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/22774/ Or is there known issues we are planning to fix now? Now same faults on on tip: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/ Br, Jani Saarinen Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
