On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 10:58:38AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:23:47AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > Insist to run llist_del_all() until the free_list is found empty, this > > may avoid having to schedule more workqueues. > > The work will already be scheduled (everytime we add the first element, > the work is scheduled, and the scheduled bit is cleared before the work > is executed). So we aren't saving the kworker from having to process > another work, but we may make that having nothing to do. The question is > whether we want to trap the kworker here, and presumably you will also want > to add a cond_resched() between passes. Yes it is somewhat dubious in the two event only case, but it will save kworker in case of more events if there is a flood of llist_add. It just looked fast enough but it's up to you, it's a cmpxchg more for each intel_atomic_helper_free_state. If it's unlikely more work is added, it's better to drop it. Agree about cond_resched() if we keep it. The same issue exists in __i915_gem_free_work, but I guess it's more likely there that by the time __i915_gem_free_objects returns the free_list isn't empty anymore because __i915_gem_free_objects has a longer runtime but then you may want to re-evaluate that too as it's slower for the two llist_add in a row case and only pays off from the third. while ((freed = llist_del_all(&i915->mm.free_list))) __i915_gem_free_objects(i915, freed); _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
