Hi Chris, [auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next] [also build test ERROR on next-20170405] [cannot apply to v4.11-rc5] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Chris-Wilson/drm-i915-Only-report-a-wakeup-if-the-waiter-was-truly-asleep/20170405-165353 base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next config: x86_64-randconfig-x004-201714 (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901 reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=x86_64 All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/gpu//drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c: In function '__wake_up_sleeper': >> drivers/gpu//drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c:38:13: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'on_cpu'; did you mean 'on_rq'? return !tsk->on_cpu && wake_up_process(tsk); ^~ >> drivers/gpu//drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c:39:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] } ^ vim +38 drivers/gpu//drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c 32 /* Be careful not to report a successful wakeup if the waiter is 33 * currently processing the seqno, where it will have already 34 * called set_task_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE). We first check whether 35 * the task is currently asleep before calling ttwu, and then we 36 * only report success if we were the ones to then trigger the wakeup. 37 */ > 38 return !tsk->on_cpu && wake_up_process(tsk); > 39 } 40 41 static unsigned int __intel_breadcrumbs_wakeup(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b) 42 { --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Attachment:
.config.gz
Description: application/gzip
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
