On 04/04/2017 11:53 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> This is going to be a bit too much, but good to have at least a small
> note about where this should all head towards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/drm/drm_drv.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
> index 9fe6301edd6a..0a367cf5d8d5 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
> @@ -274,6 +274,11 @@ struct drm_driver {
> * constant but unknown small number of scanlines wrt. real scanout
> * position.
> *
> + * FIXME:
> + *
> + * Since this is a helper to implement @get_vblank_timestamp, we should
> + * move it to &struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs, like all the other
> + * helper-internal hooks.
> */
> int (*get_scanout_position) (struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
> unsigned int flags, int *vpos, int *hpos,
> @@ -317,6 +322,11 @@ struct drm_driver {
> *
> * True on success, false on failure, which means the core should
> * fallback to a simple timestamp taken in drm_crtc_handle_vblank().
> + *
> + * FIXME:
> + *
> + * We should move this hook to &struct drm_crtc_funcs like all the other
> + * vblank hooks.
> */
> bool (*get_vblank_timestamp) (struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
> int *max_error,
>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
