On to, 2017-03-30 at 15:50 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > As we now distinguish everywhere that can call > i915_gem_retire_requests() following a successful wait_for_idle, we can > remove the duplication by moving that call into i915_gem_wait_for_idle() > itself. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SNIP> > @@ -4180,8 +4180,6 @@ fault_irq_set(struct drm_i915_private *i915, > goto err_unlock; > > /* Retire to kick idle work */ Stale comment, best before date was yesterday. i915_gem_idle_gpu or something might be more descriptive now. Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
