Robert Bragg <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Don't throw a warning if we are given an invalid property id. While
>> here let's also bring back Robert' original idea of catching unhandled
>> enumeration values at compile time.
>>
>> Fixes: eec688e1420d ("drm/i915: Add i915 perf infrastructure")
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Robert Bragg <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_
>> perf.c
>> index 8c121187ff39..e52bc6a581e6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
>> @@ -1793,6 +1793,11 @@ static int read_properties_unlocked(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> + if (id == 0 || id >= DRM_I915_PERF_PROP_MAX) {
>> + DRM_DEBUG("Unknown i915 perf property ID\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> switch ((enum drm_i915_perf_property_id)id) {
>> case DRM_I915_PERF_PROP_CTX_HANDLE:
>> props->single_context = 1;
>> @@ -1862,9 +1867,8 @@ static int read_properties_unlocked(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> props->oa_periodic = true;
>> props->oa_period_exponent = value;
>> break;
>> - default:
>> + case DRM_I915_PERF_PROP_MAX:
>> MISSING_CASE(id);
>> - DRM_DEBUG("Unknown i915 perf property ID\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.9.3
>>
>>
> Looks good to me, thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Robert Bragg <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Pushed. Thanks for patch and review.
-Mika
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
