On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 04:11:32PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: >> Currently intel_dp_check_link_status() tries to retrain the link if >> Clock recovery or Channel EQ for any of the lanes indicated by >> intel_dp->lane_count is not set. However these values cached in intel_dp >> structure can be stale if link training has failed for these values >> during previous modeset. Or these values can get stale since we have >> now re read the DPCD registers or it can be 0 in case of connected boot >> case. >> >> This patch validates these values against the common_rates and max lane >> count values. >> >> This is absolutely required incase the common_rates or max lane count >> are now different due to link fallback. >> >> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c >> index fd96a6c..51fa6b5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c >> @@ -295,6 +295,23 @@ static int intel_dp_link_rate_index(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, >> return -1; >> } >> >> +static bool intel_dp_link_params_is_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) >> +{ >> + int common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES]; >> + int link_rate_index; >> + >> + link_rate_index = intel_dp_link_rate_index(intel_dp, >> + common_rates, >> + intel_dp->link_rate); > > Hmm. I thought we started to store the common rates somewhere more > permanent, or did I imagine that? That series got stalled waiting for Manasi's stuff to land... which means it's now conflicting and pending rebase, and still waiting. :( J. > >> + if (link_rate_index < 0) >> + return false; >> + if (!intel_dp->lane_count || >> + (intel_dp->lane_count > intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp))) > > Needless parens. > >> + return false; >> + >> + return true; >> +} >> + >> int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, >> int link_rate, uint8_t lane_count) >> { >> @@ -4224,9 +4241,10 @@ intel_dp_check_link_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) >> if (!to_intel_crtc(intel_encoder->base.crtc)->active) >> return; >> >> - /* FIXME: we need to synchronize this sort of stuff with hardware >> - * readout. Currently fast link training doesn't work on boot-up. */ > > You shouldn't remove the FIXME. It's still totally valid. > >> - if (!intel_dp->lane_count) >> + /* Validate the cached values of intel_dp->link_rate and >> + * intel_dp->lane_count before attempting to retrain. >> + */ >> + if (!intel_dp_link_params_is_valid(intel_dp)) >> return; >> >> /* Retrain if Channel EQ or CR not ok */ >> -- >> 2.1.4 -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx