On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:07:28PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> Launch $EDITOR when extracting tags to curate the tags immediately. Once the
> tags are proper, automatically add them before the first Signed-off-by line
> to all patches in the range.
Not sure adding them before the first sob is the right thing. If we want
the tags to reflect the history somehow, then I suppose they should go
just before *your* sob, which may or may not be the first sob in the
commit message. Personally I've just started slapping them to the end
which also maintains the history, but granted it doesn't really show who
signed off on those tags. Or is there some "official" rule how tags
should be sorted in commit messages?
And I don't like the $EDITOR idea either, so at least make it
optional.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> dim | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dim b/dim
> index 43ea794..6a5580a 100755
> --- a/dim
> +++ b/dim
> @@ -1145,6 +1145,12 @@ function rangeish()
> fi
> }
>
> +function insert_extracted_tags
> +{
> + new_tabs=`cat $1 | awk '{ORS="\\\\n"} {print $0}' | head -c-3`
> + awk "/Signed-off-by/{p++} p==1{print \"$new_tabs\"; p++} p!=1{print}"
> +}
> +
> function dim_extract_tags
> {
> local branch range file tags
> @@ -1167,9 +1173,10 @@ function dim_extract_tags
> return 0
> fi
>
> - tags=$(printf -- "# *** extracted tags ***\n%s" "$tags")
> -
> - git filter-branch -f --msg-filter "cat ; echo \"$tags\"" $range
> + echo "$tags" > $file
> + $EDITOR $file
> + export -f insert_extracted_tags
> + git filter-branch -f --msg-filter "insert_extracted_tags $file" $range
> }
>
> function dim_extract_queued
> --
> 2.12.1.500.gab5fba24ee-goog
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
