Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Actually pass the reclaim gfp_t along to shmemfs!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On ke, 2017-03-22 at 22:34 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Words cannot describe the embarrassment at creating a new gfp_t relaim to
> only prevent the oomkiller but allow direct|kswapd reclaim, and then not
> use it in the shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp().
> 
> Fixes: 24f8e00a8a2e ("drm/i915: Prefer to report ENOMEM rather than incur the oom for gfx allocations")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux