On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 09:15:23PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 03:47:31PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 09:36:08AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > To match the drm_ioctl.c we already have.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c | 1 +
> > > include/drm/drmP.h | 61 +-------------------------
> > > include/drm/drm_ioctl.h | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 3 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 include/drm/drm_ioctl.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> > > index 601bb0ded9d2..7f4f4f48e390 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
<snip>
> > > +#define DRM_MAJOR 226
> > > +
> > > +#define DRM_AUTH 0x1
> > > +#define DRM_MASTER 0x2
> > > +#define DRM_ROOT_ONLY 0x4
> > > +#define DRM_CONTROL_ALLOW 0x8
> > > +#define DRM_UNLOCKED 0x10
> > > +#define DRM_RENDER_ALLOW 0x20
> > > +
> > > +struct drm_ioctl_desc {
> > > + unsigned int cmd;
> > > + int flags;
> > > + drm_ioctl_t *func;
> > > + const char *name;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +/**
> >
> > s/**/*/ ?
>
> It'll get addressed in the next patch, where I clean up the kernel-doc. I
> assume I can still get your r-b for this patch here?
Sure thing.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
