Em Qua, 2017-03-22 às 15:21 +0200, Ville Syrjälä escreveu: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:57:10PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > > > Because {hsw,skl,bxt}_ddi_pll_select all pretty much do the same > > thing > > in slightly different ways. Replace everything with a simple copy > > of > > the function and inline it inside intle_ddi_pll_select(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 58 +++++----------------------- > > ------------ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > > index d8214ba..bd6fd0b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > > @@ -1127,47 +1127,6 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct > > intel_encoder *encoder, > > bxt_ddi_clock_get(encoder, pipe_config); > > } > > > > -static bool > > -hsw_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > > - struct intel_encoder *encoder) > > -{ > > - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll; > > - > > - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, > > - encoder); > > - if (!pll) > > - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe > > %c\n", > > - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe)); > > - > > - return pll; > > -} > > - > > -static bool > > -skl_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > > - struct intel_encoder *encoder) > > -{ > > - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll; > > - > > - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, > > encoder); > > - if (pll == NULL) { > > - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe > > %c\n", > > - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe)); > > - return false; > > - } > > - > > - return true; > > -} > > - > > -static bool > > -bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > > - struct intel_encoder *encoder) > > -{ > > - return !!intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, > > encoder); > > -} > > - > > /* > > * Tries to find a *shared* PLL for the CRTC and store it in > > * intel_crtc->ddi_pll_sel. > > @@ -1178,19 +1137,16 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc > > *intel_crtc, > > bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > > struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > > { > > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc- > > >base.dev); > > struct intel_encoder *encoder = > > intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(crtc_state); > > + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll; > > > > - if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) > > - return skl_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state, > > - encoder); > > - else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) > > - return bxt_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state, > > - encoder); > > - else > > - return hsw_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state, > > - encoder); > > + pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, > > encoder); > > I wonder if intel_ddi_pll_select() has any good reason to even exist > anymore. It's just calling this one function, so maybe we should just > call it directly? You're right here. Then the two callers would be haswell_crtc_compute_clock() and ironlake_crtc_compute_clock(), which makes even more sene. I'll submit another patch. > > > > > + if (!pll) > > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe > > %c\n", > > + pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe)); > > + > > + return pll; > > I would probably write 'pll != NULL' for a bit of extra clarity. Are you talking about the return statement or the if condition? I'll assume you're talking about the return statement. I can fix this. Another thing would be "return !!pll". I'm fine with all approaches. > > Either way > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! > > > > > } > > > > void intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings(const struct intel_crtc_state > > *crtc_state) > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx