Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: make context status notifier head be per engine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > Since intel_gvt_init() is called at early initialization stage and
> > > require the status notifier head has been initiated, I initiate it in
> > > intel_engine_setup().
> > > 
> > > v2: remove a redundant newline. (chris)
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Applied to gvt-next, thanks!
> 
> It turns out this fixes a use-after-free bug that CI was falling over.
> Applied to dinq.
> 
wow, that's out of my expectation. lucky!

> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100232
> -Chris
> 
> -- 
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> _______________________________________________
> intel-gvt-dev mailing list
> intel-gvt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gvt-dev

-- 
Thanks,
Changbin Du

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux