On systems without LLC, drm_intel_gem_bo_map_unsynchronized() has had the surprising behavior of doing a synchronized GTT mapping. This is obviously not what the user of the API wanted. Eric left a comment indicating a valid concern: if the CPU and GPU caches are incoherent, we don't keep track of where the user last mapped the buffer, and what caches might contain relevant data. Modern Atom systems still don't have LLC, but they do offer snooping, which effectively makes the caches coherent. The kernel appears to set up the PTE/PPAT to enable snooping for everything where the cache level is not I915_CACHE_NONE. As far as I know, only scanout buffers are marked as uncached. Any buffers used by scanout should be flagged as non-reusable with drm_intel_bo_disable_reuse(), prime export, or flink. So, we can assume that any reusable buffer should be snooped. This patch enables unsynchronized mappings for reusable buffers on all Gen6+ hardware (which have either LLC or snooping). On Broxton, this improves the performance of Unigine Valley 1.0 on Low settings at 1280x720 by about 45%, and Unigine Heaven 4.0 (same settings) by about 53%. Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: mesa-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) It looks like Mesa and Beignet are the only callers of this function (SNA and Anvil don't use libdrm, UXA and vaapi don't use this function.) This passed our full barrage of Piglit/dEQP/GLCTS/GLESCTS testing. gnome-shell still works, as does Unigine, and GLBenchmark. I haven't tested any OpenCL workloads. diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c index e260f2dc..f53f1fcc 100644 --- a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c +++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c @@ -1630,9 +1630,7 @@ int drm_intel_gem_bo_map_unsynchronized(drm_intel_bo *bo) { drm_intel_bufmgr_gem *bufmgr_gem = (drm_intel_bufmgr_gem *) bo->bufmgr; -#ifdef HAVE_VALGRIND drm_intel_bo_gem *bo_gem = (drm_intel_bo_gem *) bo; -#endif int ret; /* If the CPU cache isn't coherent with the GTT, then use a @@ -1641,8 +1639,12 @@ drm_intel_gem_bo_map_unsynchronized(drm_intel_bo *bo) * terms of drm_intel_bo_map vs drm_intel_gem_bo_map_gtt, so * we would potentially corrupt the buffer even when the user * does reasonable things. + * + * The caches are coherent on LLC platforms or snooping is enabled + * for the BO. The kernel enables snooping for non-scanout (reusable) + * buffers on modern non-LLC systems. */ - if (!bufmgr_gem->has_llc) + if (bufmgr_gem->gen < 6 || !bo_gem->reusable) return drm_intel_gem_bo_map_gtt(bo); pthread_mutex_lock(&bufmgr_gem->lock); -- 2.12.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx