On 10/03/2017 10:54, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:32:49AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> In commit 003342a50021 ("drm/i915: Keep track of active forcewake domains in a bitmask") I forgot to adjust the newly introduce fw_domains_active state across reset. This caused the assert_forcewakes_inactive to trigger during suspend and resume if there were user held forcewakes. v2: Bitmask checks are required since vfuncs are not always present. v3: Move bitmask tracking to get/put vfunc for simplicity. (Chris Wilson) Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> Fixes: 003342a50021 ("drm/i915: Keep track of active forcewake domains in a bitmask") Testcase: igt/drv_suspend/forcewake Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Paneri, Praveen" <praveen.paneri@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: v4.10+ <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>After being a chicken and waiting for CI, Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I know the feeling! Thanks, I also hope I haven't missed anything. Pushed now. Regards, Tvrtko _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
