Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Optimize VLV/CHV display FIFO updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 05:44:34PM +0200, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Use I915_{READ,WRITE}_FW() for updating the DSPARB registers on
> VLV/CHV. This is less expesive as we can grab the uncore.lock across
> the entire sequence of reads and writes instead of each register
> access grabbing it.
> 
> This also allows us to eliminate the dsparb lock entirely as the
> uncore.lock now effectively protects the contents of the DSPARB
> registers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c |  1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  3 ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index b1e9027a4f80..debb74a2b2a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -827,7 +827,6 @@ static int i915_driver_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->mm.object_stat_lock);
>  	spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->mmio_flip_lock);
> -	spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->wm.dsparb_lock);
>  	mutex_init(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
>  	mutex_init(&dev_priv->modeset_restore_lock);
>  	mutex_init(&dev_priv->av_mutex);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 3002996ddbed..6af0b1d33cab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2375,9 +2375,6 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
>  	} sagv_status;
>  
>  	struct {
> -		/* protects DSPARB registers on pre-g4x/vlv/chv */
> -		spinlock_t dsparb_lock;
> -
>  		/*
>  		 * Raw watermark latency values:
>  		 * in 0.1us units for WM0,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 99e09f63d4b3..24cdc13a416a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -1358,13 +1358,19 @@ static void vlv_atomic_update_fifo(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  
>  	trace_vlv_fifo_size(crtc, sprite0_start, sprite1_start, fifo_size);
>  
> -	spin_lock(&dev_priv->wm.dsparb_lock);
> +	/*
> +	 * uncore.lock serves a double purpose here. It allows us to
> +	 * use the less expensive I915_{READ,WRITE}_FW() functions, and
> +	 * it protects the DSPARB registers from getting clobbered by
> +	 * parallel updates from multiple pipes.
> +	 */
> +	spin_lock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);

Might be nice to document that the irq is disabled by
intel_pipe_update_start() (hence why spin_lock is safe).
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux